Thursday, 10 September 2015

Mark Kermode on Scream and its 4th installment

"It's hard to remember the impact that Wes Craven's Scream had back in 1996; a postmodern horror pastiche which parodied the conventions of the genre while still scaring up enough full-blooded shocks to frighten even the most world-weary slasher fan. Ironically, the original Scream had its media-savvy roots in Wes Craven's New Nightmare, a brilliantly bizarre postscript to the long moribund Nightmare on Elm Street franchise which put an unexpected sting into the tail of a rash of increasingly flatulent sequels. There's no such creative spark to the equally late-in-the-day Scream 4 (2011, Eiv, 15), which comes a decade after the dreary Scream 3 and contains plenty of knowing references to fatuous sequels and "postmodern, self-aware meta-shit" alongside clunking updating acknowledgement of the rise of Facebook, Twitter, torture porn et al.
Despite rewrites by Ehren Kruger, the extent of which remain a subject of debate, Kevin Williamson's script – which sends survivor-turned-writer Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) back to the town of Woodsboro, where the Ghostface killer is reincarnated once again – seems peculiarly retrograde in terms of style, substance and surprises. Considering his role as producer of 2009's utterly unnecessary remake of Last House on the Left, is it not time for the once revolutionary Craven to stop recycling his back catalogue and take a stab at something new?"

No comments:

Post a Comment